In preparation for my trip to Puerto Rico next month, I have decided to get a base tan.
So far, I have spent 9 minutes in the tanning bed and will log in another 4 or 5 tomorrow.
9 minutes sounds like nothing, right? Why should I feel this is worth typing about?
I come from a long line of very pale people who burn very easily. I also come from a very long line of skin cancer. The idea on voluntarily tanning for the point of tanning and increasing my risk of skin cancer has always been something I have been very strongly against.
However, I am probably spending my whole first day I am in Puerto Rico on the beach and out snorkelling. Being from Canada, I have basically covered everything but my hands and face since September. Even with my trusty SPF 30, I will burn.
So here's my question: what has a worse risk analysis profile: 45 minutes in the tanning bed over the course of a month or the guarantee of a sunburn? Couldn't find any evidence based medicine literature about this one...